It Doesn't Take Much

Most people have been conditioned to think that simply "more" is always and unconditionally better -- except maybe in the case of smoking, eating, drinking, and conspicuous consumption.  However, even too much of a good thing can be harmful, or counterproductive -- as in the case of exercise, when more results in injury and constant fatigue and the shortage of time and energy -- rather than increasing it.

So it is important to find out just the right amount of something -- that produces maximum results in the greater considerations of life, rather than just being ends in themselves, that begin to detract from everything else in life -- which is the often heard complaint that they don't have time to do anything more (else), so why bother?

That would be the first consideration in designing a program of any effectiveness -- that it doesn't take all one's time, to return very little -- or in many cases, no measurable results, so that such behaviors become obsessive compulsive disorders in themselves -- not necessarily an improvement from the condition they were trying to improve.

So while one may begin an activity thinking how much better they will make the rest of their lives, it can shortly become the only thing in their lives -- until eventually, they can no longer do it at all -- at which point there is a huge void in their lives, and no longer the capacity or will to embark on anything else again.  That is the problem with many overzealous programs -- that ultimately result in people becoming "burned out" and coming to to feel the futility of any further effort -- and even to care about such improvements anymore.

In fact, the whole notion of "improvement," is regarded as a folly and impossibility henceforth in their lives.  That is the mental part of "aging" -- which is the giving up that any further effort can result in a betterment -- and all one can do anymore, is simply accept deterioration and decline as gracefully as possible -- which becomes their self-fulfilling fate.

'That's why it is very important to have ways of measuring improvement -- even if one has to create them oneself, because nobody else cares anymore whether one does or doesn't.  It is vitally important that one themselves care -- and can tell the difference, which is the basis of any measurement of improvement -- and not that not being able to "discriminate" any differences anymore, is the height of age and wisdom.  Vitality, is about being able to distinguish those differences -- and especially, those things that do make a difference of significant importance.

Many lose their way -- and think that the most trivial matters, are equally as important as the most significant -- because they have no way of distinguishing the two, or anything else.  Thus every day, is simply the repetition of every day before it, and expected to be repeated as long as it is possible to do so -- as the only measure of their lives, that "more" is simply better -- always and unconditionally.

But for a rare few, the quality of life, matters more -- and not unsurprisingly, results in "more" too, but that is not its objective.  Better implies the more, but the more, does not necessarily produce the better.  This is the distinction overlooked in most discussions on the effectiveness of exercise for the human body.  What quality allows one to persist over a lifetime of sustained improvement -- and not just the traditional pattern of improvement for a relatively brief period in one's life, and then the complete cessation of it -- during those times and conditions one would benefit tremendously from that structure and orientation in one's life.

That is obviously the "step beyond," where even conventional/traditional exercise has not gone before -- in producing old people who can still do impressive things, but not in producing people who do not age in the first place -- but are regarded as "ageless" people -- or those we never think to categorize primarily by age, because of attributes that are more significant to describe them.  But it doesn't just happen.  It has to be deliberately designed to address the vulnerabilities that lead to the despair that all efforts in these matters are hopeless and futile.  Otherwise, one would do them.

But to do things just because somebody, or the mass media says one should, with no confirmation from one's own experiences, quickens the sense that all is futile and hopeless, and the institutions (authorities) exist merely to delude us further -- which is the increasing cynicism and disbelief of the old, that anything can be trusted anymore.

The key is not setting oneself up for these disappointments and failures -- but rather, designing the milestones (measurements) for easy success that becomes a habit and expectation invariably fulfilled.  There is nothing wrong with succeeding time after time after time so that it becomes one's tendency -- and the path of least resistance.  That is a mind-boggling concept for those who have been conditioned, and condition themselves always to make things harder on themselves -- thinking there is something virtuous in that -- until eventually, their goals are too far from their capabilities -- and discourages them from even trying anymore.

That's usually and predictably how people fail.  Knowing this, one would then plan to fail, as much as to succeed -- or program rest, as well as effort.  That is much like the action and example of the heart -- that derives its usefulness from its ability to both fully contract, as well as fully relax.  Formerly very active, dedicated and devoted people quit entirely -- for that reason, that they think they have to always do too much, and never allow themselves adequate time for rest and recovery -- until they are forced to, by some cataclysmic breakdown of the body now demanding rest and time off.

So before one gets to that point, too much of a good thing -- can become a bad thing too, and not train to the point of exhaustion and failure, on a daily or weekly basis -- and build up that reserve instead for the long haul, and those times when one actually has to go to those limits.  But not routinely.  That is what one is trying to build up.

Should Sunlight (Tanning Beds) Be Banned?

Do you people believe that all of life (plant and animal), evolved in the absence of sunlight -- or BECAUSE there is sunlight?

Some of these researchers would have us believe that the natural source of vitamin D throughout human evolution has been Vitamin D fortified milk.

These same researchers believe that all food comes on styrofoam trays wrapped in cellophane or they are not 100% safe to eat.

In the absence of (sun)light, plants can't grow, and millions of marijuana growers have proven, that they can produce a superior product (plant) with artificial light -- and actually eliminate some of the harmful range of light to produce a safer light -- than natural sunlight.

95% of the stimulus of the brain is light, and miners trapped and buried underground for days, have their health greatly impaired by the absence of light. What do you people think is natural light -- fire, compact fluorescent bulbs, LEDs, fission, fusion, sun/moonlight?

I do 5 minutes in the tanning booth a week during the winter time so as not to come down with Seasonal Affective Disorder -- because I know that works for me. Most other animals spend a whole lot more time soaking up the sun rays -- because unlike these so-called researchers, they don't have dermatologists to tell them not to -- or can't read what is best for them.

Just really think about it.

The Future of Society and Well-Being

Fast forward to 2013 and the "new" old age. These people don't even "look" old.
Gym memberships are now $10 a month -- with no long term contracts. Exercise machines have been created to overcome every conceivable handicap, limitation or reservation. Everyone can do it their own way -- with what is comfortable and possible for them to do safely.
Probably the best overall body movement is the rowing machine -- without the fear/danger of drowning, or having to bear weight on overused and often problematical feet, ankles, knees, hips, back.
Walking or running is not the optimal activity or movement for every human being. That is the real strength of human diversity -- different people are good at different things, and together human society and progress is vastly more than the sum of the parts -- and not the "old" mass (media) model of one size fits all -- if we just force it hard enough.
That's really the direction society needs to move -- now that vastly more people will be reaching seniority, and the old aging paradigm is no longer and adequate response to the challenges of the future.
We don't need more health care -- as much as we need more truly healthy people, who are the own primary care-givers, because they really care about themselves first -- and not that that is whatever somebody else should be doing for them. That is the current crisis -- that is not sustainable or viable -- for the future of society and well-being.